**I am making the book freely available; a link is provided at the bottom of this page. **But first I want to explain the ideas which I have tried to embody in the book.

The students taking this course have (I assume) completed a standard technical calculus sequence. They will have seen some proofs, but may have dismissed them as irrelevant to what they needed to know for homework or exams. We now want them to start thinking in terms of properties of mathematical objects and logical deduction, and to get them used to writing in the customary language of mathematics. I don't think we accomplish that with the how-to approach to writing proofs that some texts take. That encourages students to think of a mathematical proof as some sort of meaningless ritual that they must learn to do simply because we require them to. Rather we want them to begin to think like mathematicians, and to become conversant with the language of written mathematics.

Another concern I have with some texts is their deconstructive approach. Students are implicitly told to forget what they know, because we want to start from scratch with an axiomatic approach. For instance if we develop the integers or real numbers from their axioms, we have to ask the students to suspend what they already know about these basic number systems so that we can develop them anew from the axioms. Instead of building our students' knowledge we seem to be dismantling it and sending them backwards to more primitive topics. I want to downplay that and instead develop topics that are not so obvious to the students, so that when we prove something we are moving forward rather than backward. I do think it is important for students to understand what a set of axioms is, and what an axiomatic development is like. So I have presented a set of axioms for the integers and proven a few elementary properties from them, so students can see the mental discipline required to set aside all our presumptions and work from the axioms alone. But I think it is enough to have made that point. So I go on to focus on the Well Ordering Principle as the property distinguishes the integers from other familiar number systems.

Another goal is to train students to read more
involved proofs such as they may encounter in advanced books and
journal articles. This involves being able to fill in details that
a proof leaves to the reader. Even more important is being able
to look past the details to see the fundamental idea behind a proof.
To this end Chapter 5 is built around some results about
polynomials (Descartes' Rule of Signs and the Fundamental Theorem of
Algebra) whose proofs are accessible to students at this level, but are
more substantial than anything they have encountered previously.
Chapter 6 gives a treatment of determinants. The proofs of that
chapter are mostly based on careful manipulations using the explicit
formula for det(A), and provide an opportunity to help the students
learn to scrutinize a detailed formula-based argument. The final
section develops a proof of the Cayley-Hamilton theorem. This
illustrates how a rigorous proof can emerge from a careful examination
of a cute but questionable manipulation using the adjoint matrix.
Many people want their bridge course to involve ideas from linear
algebra, and this chapter provides some of that.

I expect many of my colleagues to react with,
"this is too hard for the typical student." My philosophy is that
the instructor has a rather different role to play than the written
text. He/she does not merely recite the material (and grade
papers), but serves as a sort of intellectual trainer, prodding
students toward more sophisticated points of view and encouraging them
in the face of new challenges. In this course especially, I view
the instructor's role as helping students learn to read and work from a
text written in a style typical of what they will encounter in their
upper level courses. So I have tried to write a book that is not
a comfortable accommodation of where the students are when they start
the course, but an example of the kind of exposition they will need to
work from in the future, with their instructor serving as a coach for
this their first encounter.

You are welcome to download the current version of the book (pdf file), use it, and redistribute it for noncommercial purposes (such as provide it to students, either electronically or by having your local copy shop print it up for them). If you do use the book to teach a course, I would enjoy to hear from you about how it worked out and any comments or suggestions you have. Please note that under the no-derivatives restriction you may not distribute problem solutions in any electronic form. For details of what the copyright allows, see the link in the copyright statement below. -- M. Day

The book is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.